Univalve.net Forums  

Go Back   Univalve.net Forums > Feedback > THD
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-14-2009, 02:13 AM
Stu Blue Stu Blue is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: London, England, UK
Posts: 642
Default London Power Saving for Uni/Bi-Valve?

Just wondering if Andy and co at THD have considered London Power Saving as an alternative to the "attenuator" in the Uni/Bi-valve since so many people on this forum find the tone changes too much with very low volume use. The clips that Manu posted a while back were very impressive...
__________________
'64 Strat, '65 JTM45, 2007 Bi-Valve
http://www.myspace.com/graveyardexpress
www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGfNFBf-Vvo
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-15-2009, 12:54 AM
stephen sawall's Avatar
stephen sawall stephen sawall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: seattle wa usa
Posts: 545
Default

Last I talked to Andy and Ed (6 weeks ago) they were not releasing the next amp or anything else new till the economy gets better. There was a lot less people at the shop then the last time I was there. I do not know if this is a effect of the economy or not.

The Hot Plate in My Bivalve I was told is a watered down version of the Hot Plate. It has no switches / etc. They did not put it on the Flexi because the thing was "melting". It does not sound near as good as my other / separate Hot Plate with the Bivalve.

Personally I never liked the sound of London Power Saving (or what ever it is called) on any amp I have played with it. (Taste)

If I remember correctly that is done in the phase inverter. A lot of the sound of THD amps is in the power amp. I do not know if it would help with the amp or not ?

All the Hot Plates sound best when used with less attenuation.

To my taste the Hot Plate on the Bivalve sounds best above 1 o'clock.

But who knows ?

Last edited by stephen sawall : 05-15-2009 at 01:03 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-15-2009, 04:33 AM
Stu Blue Stu Blue is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: London, England, UK
Posts: 642
Default

Yes ... it's London Power Scaling... I thought it worked by reducing voltage to power valves... here's the manu101 thread ... www.univalve.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2997
__________________
'64 Strat, '65 JTM45, 2007 Bi-Valve
http://www.myspace.com/graveyardexpress
www.youtube.com/watch?v=LGfNFBf-Vvo
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-15-2009, 06:50 AM
stephen sawall's Avatar
stephen sawall stephen sawall is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: seattle wa usa
Posts: 545
Default

The amps I have played I felt were kind of lifless for a better word for it.
Only a few I have tried and I never heard them with out it. So it could have been the amp ?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-18-2009, 06:55 PM
DavidB DavidB is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,327
Default

I have never tried an amp with the London Power scaling feature. The Maven Peal wattage control, which I understand operates differently, sounds very good in Maven Peal amps -- brings otherwise unbearable loudness down to manageable levels. Unfortunately, Maven Peal amps aren't made anymore and apparently noone has licensed the technology, unlike London Power.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-21-2009, 06:18 PM
rubrshrk rubrshrk is offline
Contributing Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 456
Default

I'm a fan of both Power Scaling and attenuation, but both have some limitations. At more extreme volume reduction, some tone is stripped off. One can compensate by careful tube choice, but only to a point.

Much of the tonal difference that happens with loudness is explained by Fletcher-Munson curves (the modern term is Equal Loudness Curve, which describes a more scientifically derived response) and Steve here did a very useful and informative illustration of this effect with attenuators a while back.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-22-2009, 01:47 AM
manu101 manu101 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 52
Default

I'm still very happy with my decision to mod my Bivalve with Power scaling. To me, the built-in attenuator was useless at high attenuation and, being a basement player, 30 watts of EL34 power, even at medium gain, is way too loud! Granted, the power scaling mod is not THE magic recipe. But it is an unexpensive alternative. And once you've learn how to use it properly, it does the trick very nicely!
__________________
Manu
Gtrs: Gibson ES-339, Edwards E-LP-92CD/P w/Kinman P90Hx, Bill Lawrence Swampkaster S, Warmoth chambered Strat w/WCR HB, USMasters LG507, Carvin C780
Amps: Bivalve (Mods: Power Scaling, Tube parallel FX loop, 1 additionnal preamp tube stage), MatAmp Little Rock w/Power Scaling
Cabs: Avatar 212 (G12H/V30), AB Custom Audio 112 (WGS Green Beret), AB Custom Audio 410 (THD V10), Axetrak
Pedals: Fulltone OCD (v2), MP Deep Blue Delay, Dunlop Crybaby (modded), Stephenson Fix My Duck, Holy Grail+
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.